{"id":42028,"date":"2021-04-26T15:17:17","date_gmt":"2021-04-26T15:17:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/revistaidees.cat\/analisis\/diari-de-les-idees\/diari-de-les-idees-41\/"},"modified":"2021-05-31T09:20:46","modified_gmt":"2021-05-31T09:20:46","slug":"diari-de-les-idees-41","status":"publish","type":"newspaper","link":"https:\/\/revistaidees.cat\/en\/analisis\/diari-de-les-idees\/diari-de-les-idees-41\/","title":{"rendered":"Diari de les idees 41"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

This new edition of Diari de les idees<\/em> continues to reflect on the evolution of the international context after the impact of the pandemic, where the different rates of economic recovery will determine the evolution of our societies in the near future. The struggle between the hegemonic powers, the weakness of the EU, the context of structural polarisation of Spanish politics and the disorientation of Catalan politics are the other issues that mark the opinion of these weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In her reflection on the new geostrategic scenarios, Mireille Delmas-Marty reflects on the new issue of Le Grand Continent<\/em><\/a> on the need for global governance that, from a legal perspective, provides the international community with the necessary tools to be able to manage the effects of a changing and rapidly evolving world. These tools must be adapted to the concepts and transformations that define today’s reality. Also in terms of global governance, Lawrence O. Gostin criticises in Foreign Policy<\/em><\/a> the absurd actions and innocuous measures that were taken during the first months of the pandemic and proposes a series of aspects to be corrected in the face of similar situations in the future. Problems related to the standardisation and exchange of data that were impossible to correct despite the existence of the International Health Regulations. Or the inequality in access to supply chains, a deficiency that has been particularly important in the case of the poorest countries.\u202f In this sense, it proposes new post-pandemic agreements by international institutions, within the framework of the United Nations and the WHO, through which to strengthen the global health system and improve forecasting and future actions by world governments. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

An international order, where tensions are the order of the day and where the points of friction between the United States and the two other great powers, Russia and, above all, China, stand out.. In Foreign<\/em> Affairs, James Goldgeyer<\/em><\/a> reviews the constant back-and-forth in US-Russia relations since the end of the USSR, and poses a complicated future scenario. Against this backdrop, the Biden administration does not appear to have the will to move closer together, as evidenced by the package of sanctions it has just adopted towards Russia. Perhaps the only avenue for rapprochement will come from mutual interest in reducing nuclear arsenals, but numerous challenges, such as the conflict in Ukraine, the persecution of opponents such as Navalny, massive Russian hacks and the shadow of interference in the US elections, raise pessimistic prospects for future relations between the two great powers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At the same time, Michael Kugelman analyses in Foreign Policy<\/em><\/a> Russia’s growing influence on the Asian continent. He stresses that the Russia-China relationship, despite having weakened during the post-Cold War period, continues to maintain important ties and relations that serve the interests of both countries. With regard to India’s real interest, two basic issues are security and Afghanistan. India is aware of its military dependence on Russia, and despite the risk of US sanctions, the purchase of Russian nuclear weapons has gone ahead. At the same time, relations are also growing closer with Pakistan, especially on the issue of Afghanistan and energy resources, and in particular the exploitation of natural gas by Russian companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

With regard to the analysis of the rivalry between the United States and China, from the pages of the same journal Andrei Lungu<\/a> emphasises that ideology plays a prominent role in the struggle between the two powers. In this regard, the internal document of the Communist Party Statement on<A[donde|d\u00f3nde]> the Current State of the Ideological Sphere<\/em><\/a> <\/em>highlights that the main threats to the People’s Republic of China are universal values, constitutional democracy, civil society, neoliberalism and the denial of the country’s socialist nature. An ideological factor is also important in Washington and the West, and tensions at this level are inevitable as Western governments and societies cannot be indifferent to China’s rights abuses. As pointed out by Brian Y.S. Wong<\/a> Beijing realises that a declining international reputation will not help the country achieve its goals of hegemony as unfavourable views of China in the US and around the world have reached unprecedented heights in the past year. It should also be noted that the anti-China turn to the US foreign policy establishment has not helped.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At the European level, the case known as Sofagate is undoubtedly the most prominent, following the protocol humiliation that Recep Tayyip Erdogan subjected EU president Ursula von der Leyen to. Hans von der Burchard points out in the journal Politico<\/em><\/a> that the incident not only reveals a sexist attitude on the part of the Turkish leader (and also of Belgian European Council president Charles Michel) but also demonstrates the low regard in various policy areas for the European Union as a political entity. A situation that ultimately illustrates and symbolises the EU’s erratic trajectory throughout these pandemic months.. The Economist<\/em><\/a> also looks at the mistakes the European Union has made in managing the pandemic, and how this affects the stability of the Union. He also asks how it is possible that a rich, scientifically advanced region with very strong public health systems is having so many problems managing both the pandemic and the accompanying economic crisis. Moreover, it also highlights the fact that the EU’s growth as of the fourth quarter of 2020 has been much lower than that of the United States and China, which are recovering much more rapidly economically from the pandemic. Moreover, the stimulus packages linked to the recovery fund are not expected to arrive for a few months. The EU’s institutional architecture means that countries are fighting each other in committee for the funds provided, which only prolongs the negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Europe also views with concern the escalation of violence in Northern Ireland after Brexit. Sarah Creighton considers in The Guardian<\/em><\/a> that the violence experienced at the beginning of April has to do with a lack of Unionist leadership and represents a collective failure of politicians in Northern Ireland, as well as revealing a disconnect between the members of the legislature and the citizenry. At the same time, although originally supported by the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP), Brexit has been a disaster for Unionists who experience the creation of the new border in the Irish Sea as an abandonment by their representatives at Stormont and Westminster. Ultimately, in the centenary year of Irish independence, political unionism has no clear strategy for dealing with violence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On the Catalan political scene, the difficulties and delays in reaching an agreement to form a government after the elections last February are increasingly worrying. A complex situation that Josep Ramoneda defines to the daily newspaper Ara<\/em><\/a> as an amalgam of events that have led to the derailment of Catalan political power. It also argues that Catalonia does not meet any of the requirements for achieving the goal of independence immediately, even if the pro-independence movement has an electoral majority supported by its voting base. There is no institutional force on the opposing side that is willing to establish a dialogue in order to reach a reasonable agreement. Catalan society rejects “insurrection”, among many other factors that increase the fear of calling a spade a spade. In addition, it is this very paralysis that, according to Ramoneda, has led to the current scenario. In the same newspaper, the former Catalan minister Carles Mund\u00f3<\/a> stresses that the trivialisation of Catalan institutions feeds back into the idea that Catalan autonomy does not work as it should. The Catalan people deserve a strong government to deal with the current health situation and therefore proposes that Pere Aragon\u00e9s be invested, thus building a majority to be able to move forward with the necessary actions in good governance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In terms of Spanish politics, all the current events are determined by what is already being called the ‘battle of Madrid’ in the run-up to the regional elections on 4 March. In the midst of a climate of growing and extremely polarised tension, boycotts, threats and physical aggression, there is not much room for debate and the presentation of programmes. It would therefore be advisable to balance the opinions because, as Santiago Alba points out in the magazine Contexto<\/em><\/a>, It is not a confrontation between two extremes as the PP’s right wing and Vox’s far-right are trying to make out: there is a radicalised right wing that promotes hatred and lies, and a more or less social democratic left wing that has at times taken up the provocations, but has never tried just to break the rules of the democratic game. An far-right that in this campaign is unleashing all the typical arsenal and verbal violence that is not new but consubstantial to most European neo-fascist groups and, especially, to the Spanish ultras. Thus, Francesc-Marc \u00c1lvaro points out in La Vanguardia<\/em><\/a> that fascism uses language to provoke, to provoke, to demonise and to heat up the atmosphere, throwing the stone and hiding – not much – the hand. That such a thing is being reproduced in Spain today is a failure and a challenge. But it does not happen overnight and it is worth reflecting seriously on the consolidation of Vox, which cannot be explained without the gradual preparation of the ground for its landing. A reflection also shared by Javier Aroca in Diario.es<\/em><\/a> raising the question of what to do when faced with a fascist party, as Vox unequivocally describes it. The easiest idea is that fascism is not to be discussed, but fought, full stop. However, it is more complex. In any case, two ideas should emerge with vigour after what has happened in recent days. First, that equidistance is a cowardly way of not fighting fascism. Second, that you cannot put on the same political plane a fascist party and those that are democratic, however unpleasant we may find their leader and however contrary their ideas may seem to us. Finally, in El Pa\u00eds<\/em><\/a>, Josep Ramoneda warns that the political scene conveys a disturbing sense of decadence. After having swung into the fantasy of the end of history, after the collapse of the Soviet-style systems, after the right and the left, freed from the old ghosts, surrendered completely, during the neoliberal revolution, to the dictates of money, Western democracies have long been looking for actors to relaunch them. And it is hard to find them, not least because politics has settled into a simplistic, undemanding language that ignores and rejects complexity and feeds frivolity. A negative dialectic that is contagious. In Madrid, Isabel D\u00edaz Ayuso has taken this logic to the extreme. It is difficult to see a face so indifferent to truth and reality. When the figures are put in front of her, at most a grimace of disgust escapes her: “What are you coming at me with now? And she has elevated this exercise to the point of hyperbole, without her opponents shining when it comes to dismantling the parody. She sets the pace. The foundations of her political figure are weak: she has grown by her own self-confidence and by keeping bars and restaurants open when others were closing them. Her opponents’ efforts to introduce rationality have not made a dent, because they have reacted too late and are lagging behind.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The scenarios of crisis, tensions and dysfunction lead Yasmeen Serhan to reflect in The Atlantic<\/em><\/a> about what will mean a return to normality after the coronavirus while pointing out some conflicting elements, such as the implementation of the COVID passport.\u202f In this sense, he warns that the first racial and class biases around vaccination are beginning to emerge and that the COVID passport divides society, as it highlights the risk of social exclusion for those who do not vaccinate.  In short, vaccination passports risk becoming a source of inequality and stratification, which is as problematic as the pandemic itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Two articles published in The New Statesman<\/em> also highlight the complexity of the tensions that affect our societies hit by the different impacts of COVID-19. The writer Arundhati Roy<\/a> describes today’s capitalism as a weapon of mass destruction, which, together with religion and nationalism, form a strong alliance that subjugates societies, as the paradigmatic case of his country, India, reveals. In the meantime, David Hare<\/a> tries to give an alternative vision to the rise of the extreme right in the world, warning that these movements have connected with the needs and perceptions of a part of the working classes. A common explanation for the rise of these populist and right-wing political movements is that they appeal to a working class and national (generally white) electorate that has seen how, in recent decades, a supposedly progressive elite has turned its back on them and devoted itself to defending its own interests. Instead, Hare sees it as the same old conservatives with more radical discourses, who have been able to create a widespread perception that they are victims of the progressive elite. This perception has become the ideological architecture that has enabled events such as Brexit, the anti-immigration policies of Trump and Orb\u00e1n, the Islamophobic policies of Modi or the anti-abortion laws in Poland. Conservatives have turned to the right while policies and solutions to the problems of the ‘simple people’ have failed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A relevant issue that is also a subject of reflection by  Aristotle Kallis in Open Democracy<\/em><\/a> where he warns about the growth of aggressive micro-sovereignties and their impact on a world where asymmetrical relations prevail.\u202f This growing lack of unity in decision-making and action has had a hindering effect, which, at the same time, seriously affects people’s rights. Thus, from their point of view, COVID-19 has led to an increase in self-centred policies and attitudes with the justification of fear and social alarm, extending the limits of the fracture of a globalised world that is becoming normalised. An aggressiveness that is often directed against women as Jacqueline Rose points out in an extensive article published in The Guardian<\/em><\/a> where she denounces the structural violence they suffer, emphasising the multiplicity of less visible forms. Rose harshly criticises the governmental apparatuses responsible for maintaining, reproducing, creating and normalising violence against women.\u202fViolence that can often be carried out without fear of the consequences, especially when it comes from spheres of power.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This violence can also be economic, as the The Economist<\/em><\/a> reveals in an article in which he analyses that some of the losers of the crisis triggered by the pandemic are precisely the essential workers. Indeed, not everyone spent the quarantine at home or teleworking, many people have found themselves in the difficult position of attending their workplace and constantly exposed to the virus. These essential tasks are usually carried out by ethnic minorities or by women, for very low pay. The pandemic has shown that essential workers are indispensable to the proper functioning of everyday life, and contrasts with the low wages shown in the data of the Institute for Fiscal Studies<\/em> (IFS), which reveals that essential workers in Britain earn 8% less than other workers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A health crisis that has shaken the economic foundations of our societies and whose impact is the subject of conflicting analyses. Thus, James K. Galbraith argues in Foreign Policy<\/em><\/a> that the COVID-19 crisis and the accumulated crises highlight the many shortcomings of neoliberal hegemony. Even so, the economic system remains highly survivable. In this new context, it is necessary to replace any outdated neoliberal dogma and to give way to a reconstruction of economic thinking and policies to make room for diversity and renewal if a competitive economy is to be maintained. In this sense, in The Guardian<\/em><\/a> Larry Elliott predicts the end of low taxes and balanced budgets, elements that are part of an agenda pursued by the International Monetary Fund and the US Treasury. Both institutions are committed to interventionist governments, inclusive growth and a new green deal. A change of attitude due to the lack of results given that austerity policies did not bring about the increase in private investment and faster growth that had been promised.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

With regard to the challenges of climate change and the ecological transition, the following article published in El Pa\u00eds<\/em><\/a> <\/em>by the President of the European Union, Ursula von der Leyen stands out that given Europe’s current lead, the EU must lead the world towards a global green pact by taking effective action. At the same time, Adam Tooze notes in Social Europe<\/em><\/a> the political and economic challenges and scenarios posed by the transition to a net-energy Europe and the achievement of zero carbon emissions by 2050.\u202fIn this sense, it proposes to be realistic with the claims and promises made for the future. Questions such as: “How much will the energy transition cost?”; “What changes will it require in the way Europeans live”; and “Is it possible to manage a just transition?” are some of the issues that invite debate and reflection. An ecological balance, which, as Toby Ord rightly points out in The Guardian<\/em><\/a> has revealed all its weaknesses with the impact of COVID-19, which has become a warning cry about all the potential risks facing humanity, and at the same time presents itself as an opportunity to raise awareness in society and administrations with a view to designing tools such as the prevention of nuclear war, climate change, the uncontrolled evolution of Artificial Intelligence, crises arising from advances in biotechnology or even a hypothetical biological weapon in the form of a planned pandemic. An extremely dangerous situation, therefore, which George Monbiot, one of the world’s leading experts on the subject, analyses in Open Democracy<\/em><\/a> where it raises the need to understand that the pandemic has not been an isolated event, but the consequence of human intrusion into wild ecosystems. Intrusion that has occurred, among others, through activities such as mining or deforestation, which have caused new pathogens to jump to humans as a result of more intense contact with other species. It is therefore necessary to rethink the way we relate to the environment that surrounds us, and this implies renouncing an economic system that requires permanent exponential growth, and replacing it with one that allows our lifestyle to be complementary to the survival of our environment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Finally, and to continue the controversies surrounding the mass vaccination process (in recent days the distribution of Johnson & Johnson’s new vaccine has also been suspended), Robin McKie, the science and environment editor of The Observer<\/em><\/a> analyses the wave of uncertainty affecting a considerable part of the population and which has forced uncomfortable questions to be asked: Should the AstraZeneca and Janssen vaccines be withdrawn? Are the vaccines safe? McKie believes that the propagation of fears leads us down a blind alley and becomes the worst possible option and that we need to relativize the situation by pointing out the consequences of not using vaccines. However, one cannot help but make uncomfortable reflections on the coincidence of the fact that the AstraZeneca vaccine is the most maligned and the only one sold at cost price. The debate on the power of pharmaceutical companies and the cost of vaccines is not being conducted with the rigour that the current urgency demands.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Doubts and misgivings aside, the pandemic has also demonstrated the great capabilities of biomedicine for the future and The Economist<\/em><\/a> points out that the major technological breakthrough has been the medical and public health response: basic biomedical science is poised to change the world. Laboratories have been testing specifically for a never-before-seen virus just a month after the first cases were reported. By mid-year, crucial information was available on which therapies, old and new, worked and did not work. The evolution of the virus was revealed by sequencing its genome on a scale to which no previous pathogen had ever been subjected. And finally, one of the technologies used – directly injected mRNA – opens up all sorts of additional possibilities for a better future. Another positive note according to Darlington Akogo in The Financial Times<\/em><\/a>,<\/em> where he highlights how Artificial Intelligence systems can help to improve the health systems of African countries as they can diagnose diseases much more quickly and accurately, through, for example, the recognition of images in X-rays that can help to combat diseases such as cancer, pneumonia, fibrosis or hernias. AI can also have a decisive application in areas such as optometry, neuroscience, epidemiology and nutrition. In short, if current barriers such as the lack of infrastructures, poor legislation on data protection and management or adequate funding adapted to the conditions of each country can be overcome, artificial intelligence can quickly become a tool that can drive the improvement and democratisation of health systems in African countries.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

This new edition of Diari de les idees continues to reflect on the evolution of the international context after the impact of the pandemic, where the different rates of economic recovery will determine the evolution of our societies in the near future. The struggle between the hegemonic powers, the weakness of the EU, the context of structural polarisation of Spanish politics and the disorientation of Catalan politics are the other issues that mark the opinion of these weeks. In her reflection on the new geostrategic scenarios, Mireille Delmas-Marty reflects on the new issue of Le Grand Continent on the need\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":38595,"template":"","category_newspaper":[320],"segment":[],"subject":[],"class_list":["post-42028","newspaper","type-newspaper","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category_newspaper-320"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nDiari de les idees 41 – IDEES<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/revistaidees.cat\/en\/analisis\/diari-de-les-idees\/diari-de-les-idees-41\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Diari de les idees 41 – IDEES\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"This new edition of Diari de les idees continues to reflect on the evolution of the international context after the impact of the pandemic, where the different rates of economic recovery will determine the evolution of our societies in the near future. The struggle between the hegemonic powers, the weakness of the EU, the context of structural polarisation of Spanish politics and the disorientation of Catalan politics are the other issues that mark the opinion of these weeks. In her reflection on the new geostrategic scenarios, Mireille Delmas-Marty reflects on the new issue of Le Grand Continent on the need\u2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/revistaidees.cat\/en\/analisis\/diari-de-les-idees\/diari-de-les-idees-41\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"IDEES\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-05-31T09:20:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/revistaidees.cat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/2021_12_david_hare_populism.jpg?fit=1280%2C800&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1280\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"16 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/revistaidees.cat\\\/en\\\/analisis\\\/diari-de-les-idees\\\/diari-de-les-idees-41\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/revistaidees.cat\\\/en\\\/analisis\\\/diari-de-les-idees\\\/diari-de-les-idees-41\\\/\",\"name\":\"Diari de les idees 41 – IDEES\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/revistaidees.cat\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/revistaidees.cat\\\/en\\\/analisis\\\/diari-de-les-idees\\\/diari-de-les-idees-41\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/revistaidees.cat\\\/en\\\/analisis\\\/diari-de-les-idees\\\/diari-de-les-idees-41\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/revistaidees.cat\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/03\\\/2021_12_david_hare_populism.jpg?fit=1280%2C800&ssl=1\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-04-26T15:17:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-05-31T09:20:46+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/revistaidees.cat\\\/en\\\/analisis\\\/diari-de-les-idees\\\/diari-de-les-idees-41\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/revistaidees.cat\\\/en\\\/analisis\\\/diari-de-les-idees\\\/diari-de-les-idees-41\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/revistaidees.cat\\\/en\\\/analisis\\\/diari-de-les-idees\\\/diari-de-les-idees-41\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/revistaidees.cat\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/03\\\/2021_12_david_hare_populism.jpg?fit=1280%2C800&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/revistaidees.cat\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/03\\\/2021_12_david_hare_populism.jpg?fit=1280%2C800&ssl=1\",\"width\":1280,\"height\":800},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/revistaidees.cat\\\/en\\\/analisis\\\/diari-de-les-idees\\\/diari-de-les-idees-41\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Inici\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/revistaidees.cat\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Diari de les idees\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/revistaidees.cat\\\/analisis\\\/diari-de-les-idees\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Diari de les idees 41\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/revistaidees.cat\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/revistaidees.cat\\\/\",\"name\":\"IDEES\",\"description\":\"Contemporary global issues\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/revistaidees.cat\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Diari de les idees 41 – IDEES","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/revistaidees.cat\/en\/analisis\/diari-de-les-idees\/diari-de-les-idees-41\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Diari de les idees 41 – IDEES","og_description":"This new edition of Diari de les idees continues to reflect on the evolution of the international context after the impact of the pandemic, where the different rates of economic recovery will determine the evolution of our societies in the near future. The struggle between the hegemonic powers, the weakness of the EU, the context of structural polarisation of Spanish politics and the disorientation of Catalan politics are the other issues that mark the opinion of these weeks. In her reflection on the new geostrategic scenarios, Mireille Delmas-Marty reflects on the new issue of Le Grand Continent on the need\u2026","og_url":"https:\/\/revistaidees.cat\/en\/analisis\/diari-de-les-idees\/diari-de-les-idees-41\/","og_site_name":"IDEES","article_modified_time":"2021-05-31T09:20:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1280,"height":800,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/revistaidees.cat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/2021_12_david_hare_populism.jpg?fit=1280%2C800&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"16 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/revistaidees.cat\/en\/analisis\/diari-de-les-idees\/diari-de-les-idees-41\/","url":"https:\/\/revistaidees.cat\/en\/analisis\/diari-de-les-idees\/diari-de-les-idees-41\/","name":"Diari de les idees 41 – IDEES","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/revistaidees.cat\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/revistaidees.cat\/en\/analisis\/diari-de-les-idees\/diari-de-les-idees-41\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/revistaidees.cat\/en\/analisis\/diari-de-les-idees\/diari-de-les-idees-41\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/revistaidees.cat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/2021_12_david_hare_populism.jpg?fit=1280%2C800&ssl=1","datePublished":"2021-04-26T15:17:17+00:00","dateModified":"2021-05-31T09:20:46+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/revistaidees.cat\/en\/analisis\/diari-de-les-idees\/diari-de-les-idees-41\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/revistaidees.cat\/en\/analisis\/diari-de-les-idees\/diari-de-les-idees-41\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/revistaidees.cat\/en\/analisis\/diari-de-les-idees\/diari-de-les-idees-41\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/revistaidees.cat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/2021_12_david_hare_populism.jpg?fit=1280%2C800&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/revistaidees.cat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/2021_12_david_hare_populism.jpg?fit=1280%2C800&ssl=1","width":1280,"height":800},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/revistaidees.cat\/en\/analisis\/diari-de-les-idees\/diari-de-les-idees-41\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Inici","item":"https:\/\/revistaidees.cat\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Diari de les idees","item":"https:\/\/revistaidees.cat\/analisis\/diari-de-les-idees\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Diari de les idees 41"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/revistaidees.cat\/#website","url":"https:\/\/revistaidees.cat\/","name":"IDEES","description":"Contemporary global issues","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/revistaidees.cat\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistaidees.cat\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/newspaper\/42028","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistaidees.cat\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/newspaper"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistaidees.cat\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/newspaper"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/revistaidees.cat\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/newspaper\/42028\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":42031,"href":"https:\/\/revistaidees.cat\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/newspaper\/42028\/revisions\/42031"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistaidees.cat\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/38595"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistaidees.cat\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=42028"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category_newspaper","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistaidees.cat\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/category_newspaper?post=42028"},{"taxonomy":"segment","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistaidees.cat\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/segment?post=42028"},{"taxonomy":"subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistaidees.cat\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/subject?post=42028"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}